Hot & Not in Hollywood

Epstein’s Secret Tapes: Maxwell’s Alleged Leverage Over Trump and Clinton. Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly claimed Epstein had tapes of Trump and Clinton but refused to release one without the other. What does this say about power, media, and selective silence?

When the Story Is Too Big to Air

In a moment that should’ve detonated headlines, Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly told CBS producer Ira Rosen that Jeffrey Epstein had tapes of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. But she wouldn’t release one without the other. The implication? These weren’t just scandalous recordings. They were leverage.

According to Rosen’s memoir, Ticking Clock: Behind the Scenes at 60 Minutes, Maxwell pointed a finger and said, “If you get the tapes on Trump, you have to do Clinton”. She knew the rules of media warfare. She was, after all, the daughter of press baron Robert Maxwell.

The Leverage Economy: Secrets as Currency

This wasn’t about justice. It was about control.

Maxwell’s alleged refusal to release the tapes unless both were aired simultaneously reveals a chilling truth: in elite circles, secrets aren’t buried; they’re banked. Epstein’s properties in Florida and New York were rumored to be wired for surveillance. Rosen, acting on a hunch, believed Epstein was “videotaping everyone.”

But no tapes have surfaced. Not in court. Not in leaks. Not in documentaries. Why?

️Media Gatekeeping: Who Decides What We See?

Rosen’s pursuit of the tapes was reportedly shut down. The story never aired. And while his memoir offers a glimpse into the editorial tug-of-war, it also raises a larger question: who gets to decide what becomes public record?

In an era where deepfakes trend faster than depositions, the absence of hard evidence doesn’t kill a story. It mutates it. The Epstein-Maxwell saga has become a Rorschach test for public trust in media, justice, and institutional transparency.

Current Echoes: Why This Still Matters

Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence, following her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy. Epstein is dead. But the ripple effects continue.

Recent headlines have reignited scrutiny of Epstein’s network, including renewed interest in his ties to global elites. Meanwhile, political figures once linked to him are scrubbing the record. Trump has said he was “not a fan” of Epstein. Clinton denies visiting Epstein’s properties. But the public isn’t buying blanket denials anymore.

The question isn’t whether the tapes exist. It’s why the possibility of them still holds power.

Demand the Full Story

This isn’t about voyeurism. It’s about accountability.

If Epstein weaponized surveillance, and Maxwell knew how to wield it, then the silence surrounding these tapes is not accidental. It’s strategic. The public deserves more than memoir crumbs and courtroom redactions. We deserve the full story. What do you think is being kept off the record?

~ * ~ Stay tuned, stay savage, stay sparkly — Holly out. ~ * ~